2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8080682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Four Machine Learning Methods for Generating the GLASS Fractional Vegetation Cover Product from MODIS Data

Abstract: Long-term global land surface fractional vegetation cover (FVC) products are essential for various applications. Currently, several global FVC products have been generated from medium spatial resolution remote sensing data. However, validation results indicate that there are inconsistencies and spatial and temporal discontinuities in the current FVC products. Therefore, the Global LAnd Surface Satellite (GLASS) FVC product algorithm using general regression neural networks (GRNNs), which achieves an FVC estima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RF has broader scope than SVM and NN, because it has no limitation on the distribution pattern of the training data. The complexity of the parameter setting may limit the performance of SVM and NN for model training [118]. Although, SVM has the advantage on solving non-linear problems, a major downside of SVM is that it can be painfully inefficient to train [119,120].…”
Section: Integration Of Various Remote Sensing Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF has broader scope than SVM and NN, because it has no limitation on the distribution pattern of the training data. The complexity of the parameter setting may limit the performance of SVM and NN for model training [118]. Although, SVM has the advantage on solving non-linear problems, a major downside of SVM is that it can be painfully inefficient to train [119,120].…”
Section: Integration Of Various Remote Sensing Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison between the satellite FVC and UAS FVC gave interesting results. The satellite FVC was based on the neural network approach, which generally tends to show a high accuracy [21,45]. However, from our observation, the lower boundary of the FVC was overestimated and the higher FVC was underestimated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The remote sensing techniques for FVC development utilize the multispectral information observed from space and validates its product with ground truth information (e.g., field surveys). The estimation methods can vary depending on the model type used, including simple empirical models [18], linear spectral models [19], decision tree method [20], machine learning techniques [21], and so on. Although the input information is rather simple, remote sensing can use various spectral information or the computed vegetation indices (Vis) for its estimation, although correctly delineating the FVC for various regions of the world is still a challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MARS is a nonparametric and multivariate regression analysis model and has been demonstrated to obtain satisfactory FVC results from MODIS reflectance data [29,56]. Without strong assumptions, MARS is capable of modeling complex nonlinear relationships among variables by fitting piecewise linear regressions.…”
Section: The Mars Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in terms of FVC products, the current FVC products were obtained mainly from low-or medium-resolution remote sensing data such as SPOT-VGT, SEAWIFS, MERIS, MODIS and AVHRR data [1,22,[28][29][30], which limits the FVC applications to the regional and local scales [31]. The development of FVC products from decametric spatial resolution sensors will be better for addressing these applications closely related to agriculture, ecosystem and environmental management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%