2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of fractal and power spectral EEG features: Effects of topography and sleep stages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 also shows the results achieved using the same method proposed in this paper, but computing classical features employed in most of the similar sleep stages studies instead of entropy metrics: the absolute power, power asymmetry, central power, coherence, phase coherence, power ratios, and relative power. Examples of application of these features and more details about them can be found in [36,44,45]. The classification results are similar to those obtained with the entropy metrics.…”
Section: Featuresupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Table 2 also shows the results achieved using the same method proposed in this paper, but computing classical features employed in most of the similar sleep stages studies instead of entropy metrics: the absolute power, power asymmetry, central power, coherence, phase coherence, power ratios, and relative power. Examples of application of these features and more details about them can be found in [36,44,45]. The classification results are similar to those obtained with the entropy metrics.…”
Section: Featuresupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Similarly, valence recognition with FD value features could achieve better results compared to PSD features because of their slightly higher absolute correlations. This evidence coincides with results from previous studies in the field of EEG-based affective computing [37], [38], which reported that the FD approach is superior to PSD in recognizing affective states because of the superior ability to analyze the non-linear behavior of the brain. Note that the SVM achieved better results than the other classifiers, i.e., C4.5 and MLP, and that similar results were also obtained in previous works [1].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Powers over band (2-4 Hz), band (4-8 Hz), band (8)(9)(10)(11)(12), band (12-18 Hz), band (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30), and band ( 30 Hz) were estimated with periodogram method [16]. AR model was also successfully applied in EEG based mental tasks classification [19] and other EEG applications [31].…”
Section: B Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our work, fractal dimension models are used to quantify the complexity of EEG signals to represent the dynamic properties of brain activities. Nonlinear FD features have been proven effective in EEG studies [21]- [24]. Compared to the linear PSD features, fractal dimension features could perform better in EEG-based applications such as emotion recognition [25], neurofeedback [26], [27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%