2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of frequency domain and time domain methods for the numerical simulation of contactless ultrasonic cavitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is at least 10 times longer than the time interval in the presented example. One option for improving the computational performance of the time-dependent method is using a truncated, approximate calculation of the bubble collapse and simultaneously parallelising the ODE solution [9]. This is suit-able for obtaining also full three-dimensional results with more than 200,000 computational cells within comfortable parameter optimisation computing time and sufficient FFT accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is at least 10 times longer than the time interval in the presented example. One option for improving the computational performance of the time-dependent method is using a truncated, approximate calculation of the bubble collapse and simultaneously parallelising the ODE solution [9]. This is suit-able for obtaining also full three-dimensional results with more than 200,000 computational cells within comfortable parameter optimisation computing time and sufficient FFT accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is justified by the fact that the acoustic time step is already sufficiently small to resolve accurately both p and its temporal derivative. An alternative implementation where the bubble collapse is approximated in a way that avoids the need for extremely small timesteps has also provided useful results [9]. At the end of each ODE interval, the integral contribution of the Caflisch source term is calculated as…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations