2017
DOI: 10.4172/2329-9096.1000402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Gain between Groups with Extreme Differences in FIM Score at Admission

Abstract: Objective: There are several methods for inter-hospital comparison of the improvement in Functional Independence Measure (FIM). However, it is not known which method is most suitable. The purpose of this study was to elucidate which of 4 methods can most successfully compare the average improvement in motor FIM (mFIM) at each hospital with the least influenced by the difference of mFIM score at admission. For this purpose, we considered 3 groups divided based on motor FIM score at admission as 3 hospitals. Met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FIM efficiency was calculated by subtracting the admission FIM from the discharge FIM, dividing this difference by the maximum possible FIM score without the admission FIM, and multiplying it by 100 (Figure 2) (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FIM efficiency was calculated by subtracting the admission FIM from the discharge FIM, dividing this difference by the maximum possible FIM score without the admission FIM, and multiplying it by 100 (Figure 2) (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discharge FIM ≥90, as suggested by prior studies, was set as the threshold for a good prognosis group (11). The FIM efficiency was calculated by subtracting the admission FIM from the discharge FIM, dividing this difference by the maximum possible FIM score without the admission FIM, and multiplying it by 100 (Figure 2) (12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the study by Tokunaga et al [3], was to elucidate the most successfully method for the average improvement in motor Functional Independence Measure (mFIM) at each hospital with the least influenced by the difference of mFIM score at admission. For this purpose, the authors considered 3 groups divided based on motor FIM score at admission as 3 hospitals.…”
Section: Obata Et Al [2]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result observed in this patient should be further tested among a large population of patients presenting similar symptoms. Moreover, the basic mechanisms underlying aquatic PW intervention should be further elucidated.The aim of the study by Tokunaga et al [3], was to elucidate the most successfully method for the average improvement in motor Functional Independence Measure (mFIM) at each hospital with the least influenced by the difference of mFIM score at admission. For this purpose, the authors considered 3 groups divided based on motor FIM score at admission as 3 hospitals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%