2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of GA and topology optimization of adherend for adhesively bonded metal composite joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This strength was measured as the force required to completely debond the joint when subjected to an applied load divided by the mass of the joint. The GA optimisation process was chosen because the previous study (Arhore et al 2021) carried out compared different optimisation methods highlighting the GA method as the better performing method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This strength was measured as the force required to completely debond the joint when subjected to an applied load divided by the mass of the joint. The GA optimisation process was chosen because the previous study (Arhore et al 2021) carried out compared different optimisation methods highlighting the GA method as the better performing method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the legacy optimisation process performed by Arhore et al (2021). In the optimisation process, a MATLAB program was created to utilise GA to select design variables within a defined design space which dictates the geometry of the outer adherend (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Arhore et al [19] surveyed the effects of joint characteristics on its strength. They used a genetic algorithm and topology optimization to optimize the joint's geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%