2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.734-737.1362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Gas Content Evaluation Methods in the Log Interpretation of Coalbed Methane

Abstract: In the log interpretation, the CBM content evaluation methods include: regression, LAN’s equation, KIM method, neural network, and so on. This paper investigates the suitability of these methods for a CBM reservoir in Southern Qinshui Basin, Shanxi Province of China, and finds out the most reasonable interpretation model of CBM content in this area. The results show that the composite parameter(COMP) method and the LAN’s equation method are more suitable for evaluating the CBM content in this study area, while… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
references
References 5 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance