2019
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-15892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of gene editing versus conventional breeding to introgress the POLLED allele into the US dairy cattle population

Abstract: Disbudding and dehorning are commonly used cattle management practices to protect animals and humans from injury. They are unpleasant, costly processes subject to increased public scrutiny as an animal welfare issue. Horns are a recessively inherited trait, so one option to eliminate dehorning is to breed for polled (hornlessness). However, due to the low genetic merit and scarcity of polled dairy sires, this approach has not been widely adopted. In March 2018, only 3 Holstein and 0 Jersey active homozygous po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gene editing is not ethically accepted by many countries today [47], but offers a faster, cheaper, healthier, more-efficient, and sustainable animal production opportunity compared to conventional breeding programs [48,49]. The technology holds potential for cattle production in future, but researchers must be aware of its challenges when applying it at a large-scale and integration in breeding schemes [47,48,50]. The success and future application of this novel technology will be largely influenced by decisions around the regulatory framework and governance of genome editing for food animals [49].…”
Section: Cattle Breeding and Reproduction Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene editing is not ethically accepted by many countries today [47], but offers a faster, cheaper, healthier, more-efficient, and sustainable animal production opportunity compared to conventional breeding programs [48,49]. The technology holds potential for cattle production in future, but researchers must be aware of its challenges when applying it at a large-scale and integration in breeding schemes [47,48,50]. The success and future application of this novel technology will be largely influenced by decisions around the regulatory framework and governance of genome editing for food animals [49].…”
Section: Cattle Breeding and Reproduction Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic sustainability and animal welfare have driven recent progress in modern livestock production systems especially in efforts to minimize or eliminate undesirable traits such as the presence of horns in cattle. Genetic dehorning is being progressively adopted as the noninvasive approach to breed hornless cattle through genetic selection (Carlson et al 2016;Mueller et al 2019). Genotype-phenotype relationships of horn growth are however complex (Medugorac et al 2012) limiting the informativeness of current assays for early detection for horn status, and the presence or absence of polled alleles (polledness), in some breeds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using genome editing, the allele has been introduced into dairy genetics in a proof of concept experiment (Carlson et al, 2016). If this allele could be edited into the genome of a number of elite dairy sires, then artificial insemination could be used to rapidly disseminate that dominant polled allele through the dairy cattle population (Mueller et al, 2019), and eliminate the need for physical horn removal, which is an animal welfare concern.…”
Section: Genetic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%