2006
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2005.031161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of gene-expression profiles in parallel bone marrow and peripheral blood samples in acute myeloid leukaemia by real-time polymerase chain reaction

Abstract: These results indicate a possible use for the method in monitoring AML in peripheral blood by RT-PCR measurement of Indicator genes. In addition, the initial use of polyA PCR facilitates translation to very small clinical samples, including fractionated cell populations, of particular importance for monitoring haematological malignancy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,11,13 There are very few studies that directly compared expression patterns in paired PB and BM samples in AML, but the available reports indicate a high degree of correlation between both sources. 13,27 Despite the important differences between the patient populations and the analytical methods, our gene-expression score was a significant predictor of survival in both the test and validation cohorts. Assessing the generalizability of a prognostic marker requires testing both its reproducibility in an independent patient sample as well as its transportability to patient cohorts with different geographic and methodologic background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…10,11,13 There are very few studies that directly compared expression patterns in paired PB and BM samples in AML, but the available reports indicate a high degree of correlation between both sources. 13,27 Despite the important differences between the patient populations and the analytical methods, our gene-expression score was a significant predictor of survival in both the test and validation cohorts. Assessing the generalizability of a prognostic marker requires testing both its reproducibility in an independent patient sample as well as its transportability to patient cohorts with different geographic and methodologic background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thirdly, we demonstrated differential gene expression between paired BM and PB CD34 + myeloblasts from individual patients. The gene list was different from that reported by Sakhinia et al (2006), who compared the gene expression of non‐purified mononuclear cells from BM and PB of AML patients. Our results were also different from those reported by Gal et al (2006), where primitive CD34 + CD38 − and more differentiated CD34 + CD38 + myeloblasts were compared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…D26156 was reported to be a discriminatory gene between AML and ALL in Golub et al [35] and was also among the top ranking genes reported in Broberg [40] based on multiple gene ranking methods. Real time PCR measurement of D26156 was highly expressed from patients with AML [46]. The protein encoded by D26156 is a member of the large ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex SWI/SNF family of proteins, which have helicase and ATPase activities and are thought to regulate transcription of certain genes by altering the chromatin structure around those genes [47].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%