1997
DOI: 10.1002/art.1790100503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of general internists, family physicians, and rheumatologists managing patients with symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee

Abstract: Objective. To evaluate the nature, risks, and benefits of osteoarthritis (OA) management by primary care physicians and rheuma tologists .Methods. Subjects were 41 9 patients followed for symptoms of knee OA by either a specialist in family medicine (FM) or general internal medicine (GIM) or by a rheumatologist (BH)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
57
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this limitation is probably not as significant as it would appear. Both surveys of the self-reported management practices (33) and a study of actual practice variations (22) show that very few primary care physicians recommend (and, therefore, have the opportunity to reinforce) nonpharmacologic treatment modalities to their patients with knee or hip OA. Skill in follow-through of self-care education in arthritis is probably uncommon in practice, as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this limitation is probably not as significant as it would appear. Both surveys of the self-reported management practices (33) and a study of actual practice variations (22) show that very few primary care physicians recommend (and, therefore, have the opportunity to reinforce) nonpharmacologic treatment modalities to their patients with knee or hip OA. Skill in follow-through of self-care education in arthritis is probably uncommon in practice, as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimism concerning the prospects for spontaneous, widespread adoption of current OA guidelines must be tempered by the fact that nonpharmacologic management practices for OA are uncommon in contemporary primary care practice (22). An alternative to convincing generalist physicians to adopt an array of new management practices is to augment primary care resources so that self-care education for knee OA patients could be implemented, for example, by an arthritis nurse specialist whose feedback could then help the primary care physician focus on the salient, ongoing needs of patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect sizes (11) for the studies presented under the miscellaneous intervention category (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) ranged from 0.04 to 1.3 for the stiffness subscale, 0.0009 to 1.17 for the physical function subscale, and 0.06 to 1.19 for the global score. In the one study reporting stiffness subscale data, the effect size was 0.55 for the control group and 0.52 for the treatment group.…”
Section: Responsivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, outcomes of persons suffering a myocardial infarction vary according to whether the patient was admitted to the hospital by a generalist or a specialist (Jollis et al 1996). In contrast, among persons with symptoms of knee osteoarthritis, physician specialty and specific management practices seem not to account for variations in patient outcomes (Mazzuca et al 1997). Research on asthma patients suggests that treatment intensity may be greater for persons treated by specialists (Engel et al 1989).…”
Section: Brief Review Of Provider Specialty Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%