2006 International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems 2006
DOI: 10.1109/ines.2006.1689357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Genetic and Gradient Descent Algorithms for Determining Fuzzy Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the past two decades, GAs have been successfully and broadly applied to solve constrained optimization problems. 26 Hong et al 27 observed that in most GA variants only crossover and mutation operators are employed in each generation. As a result, the search ability of these algorithms could be limited.…”
Section: Algorithm Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past two decades, GAs have been successfully and broadly applied to solve constrained optimization problems. 26 Hong et al 27 observed that in most GA variants only crossover and mutation operators are employed in each generation. As a result, the search ability of these algorithms could be limited.…”
Section: Algorithm Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that for n attributes, 2 n − 2 coefficients are needed to specify the model. Regarding the alternatives for fuzzy measure identification [8,5,6,7], we will focus on the HLMS algorithm [9] and its convergence. In particular, a study of the HLMS learning rate parameter and its correct setting for HLMS convergence is presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%