Comparison of GFRP (Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer) and CFRP (Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer) Composite Adhesive-Bonded Single-Lap Joints Used in Marine Environments

Abstract

Macroscopic structures consisting of two or more materials are called composites. The decreasing reserves of the world’s oil reserve and the environmental pollution of existing energy and production resources made the use of recycling methods inevitable. There are mechanical, thermal, and chemical recycling methods for the recycling of thermosets among composite materials. The recycling of thermoset composite materials economically saves resources and energy in the production of reinforcement and matrix materials. Due to the superior properties such as hardness, strength, lightness, corrosion resistance, design width, and the flexibility of epoxy/vinylester/polyester fibre formation composite materials combined with thermoset resin at the macro level, environmentally friendly sustainable development is happening with the increasing use of composite materials in many fields such as the maritime sector, space technology, wind energy, the manufacturing of medical devices, robot technology, the chemical industry, electrical electronic technology, the construction and building sector, the automotive sector, the defence industry, the aviation sector, the food and agriculture sector, and sports equipment manufacturing. Bonded joint studies in composite materials have generally been investigated at the level of a single composite material and single joint. The uncertainty of the long-term effects of different composite materials and environmental factors in single-lap bonded joints is an important obstacle in applications. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of single-lap bonded GFRP (glass fibre-reinforced polymer) and CFRP (carbon fibre-reinforced polymer) specimens on the material at the end of seawater exposure. In this study, 0/90 orientation twill weave seven-ply GFRP and eight-ply CFRP composite materials were used in dry conditions (without seawater soaking) and the hand lay-up method. Seawater was taken from the Aegean Sea, İzmir province (Selçuk/Pamucak), in September at 23.5 °C. This seawater was kept in different containers in seawater for 1 month (30 days), 2 months (60 days), and 3 months (90 days) separately for GFRP and CFRP composite samples. They were cut according to ASTM D5868-01 for single-lap joint connections. Moisture retention percentages and axial impact tests were performed. Three-point bending tests were then performed according to ASTM D790. Damage to the material was examined with a ZEISS GEMINESEM 560 scanning electron microscope (SEM). The SEM was used to observe the interface properties and microstructure of the fracture surfaces of the composite samples by scanning images with a focused electron beam. Damage analysis imaging was performed on CFRP and GFRP specimens after sputtering with a gold compound. Moisture retention rates (%), axial impact tests, and three-point bending test specimens were kept in seawater with a seawater salinity of 3.3–3.7% and a seawater temperature of 23.5 °C for 1, 2, and 3 months. Moisture retention rates (%) are 0.66%, 3.43%, and 4.16% for GFRP single-lap bonded joints in a dry environment and joints kept for 1, 2, and 3 months, respectively. In CFRP single-lap bonded joints, it is 0.57%, 0.86%, and 0.87%, respectively. As a result of axial impact tests, under a 30 J impact energy level, the fracture toughness of GFRP single-lap bonded joints kept in a dry environment and seawater for 1, 2, and 3 months are 4.6%, 9.1%, 14.7%, and 11.23%, respectively. At the 30 J impact energy level, the fracture toughness values of CFRP single-lap bonded joints in a dry environment and in seawater for 1, 2, and 3 months were 4.2%, 5.3%, 6.4%, and 6.1%, respectively. As a result of three-point bending tests, GFRP single-lap joints showed a 5.94%, 8.90%, and 12.98% decrease in Young’s modulus compared to dry joints kept in seawater for 1, 2, and 3 months, respectively. CFRP single-lap joints showed that Young’s modulus decreased by 1.28%, 3.39%, and 3.74% compared to dry joints kept in seawater for 1, 2, and 3 months, respectively. Comparing the GFRP and CFRP specimens formed by a single-lap bonded connection, the moisture retention percentages of GFRP specimens and the amount of energy absorbed in axial impact tests increased with the soaking time in seawater, while Young’s modulus was less in three-point bending tests, indicating that CFRP specimens have better mechanical properties.