2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-36424-2_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of GPU and FPGA Implementation of SVM Algorithm for Fast Image Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our proposed implementation achieved lower hardware resources utilization than some of the previous FPGA-based SVM classification implementations of different applications in literature [10], [12], [21], [23], [25], [34], [36]. Concerning power consumption, our implementation demonstrated lower power dissipation than other related work [6], [12], [25]. Therefore, our proposed system could be deployed as a real-time embedded system dedicated for melanoma detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, our proposed implementation achieved lower hardware resources utilization than some of the previous FPGA-based SVM classification implementations of different applications in literature [10], [12], [21], [23], [25], [34], [36]. Concerning power consumption, our implementation demonstrated lower power dissipation than other related work [6], [12], [25]. Therefore, our proposed system could be deployed as a real-time embedded system dedicated for melanoma detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Moreover, the common pipelining technique was used in many previous hardware designs [11,12,13], [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26], taking advantage of the parallel processing capabilities of the FPGA that led to throughput increase of the implemented classification process. Some researchers designed a pipeline stage for common and shared multipliers required for computations to decrease usage of duplicate multiplications [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers in works [14], [15] wanted to compare the performances of FPGA and GPU implementations of a human skin SVM classifier against the software performances. The critical hardware composes of FPGA were designed using HDL in a completely pipelined organization, even as the other elements like FIFO and interfaces were implemented in HLL.…”
Section: Common Pipelining Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation results confirmed the excellence of the implemented fully pipelined FPGA architecture on GPU and CPU for a small number of image pixels, while the GPU implementation was the fastest for a big number of pixels. The advantage of FPGA implementation is that consumes less power than the GPU implementation [15].…”
Section: Common Pipelining Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of computer vision, Kalarot et al [27] implement a generic disparity algorithm on the GTX 280 and the Altera Stratix III platforms. A complete blood vessel detection system from medical images [28] is implemented on a GTX 295 GPU and a Spartan-3 FPGA, while more recently, a) Pietron et al [29] compare a human skin classifier implementation on a Tesla m2090 and a Virtex 5 device and b) the ceramic tile defect detection algorithm of [30] is evaluated on the 9800GT GPU and three different FPGAs. In a slightly different direction, the authors of [31] evaluate the performance of High-Level Synthesis of GPU to FPGA stereo matching code.…”
Section: Gpu-fpga Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%