2006
DOI: 10.1029/2005wr004648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of grid‐based algorithms for computing upslope contributing area

Abstract: [1] Terrain attributes based on upslope contributing area, A, are used widely in distributed hydrologic models. Several grid-based algorithms are available for estimating A. In this study, five algorithms (D8, 8, MFD, DEMON, and D1) were compared quantitatively on two undulating agricultural fields (63 and 109 ha) in northeastern Colorado. Global positioning system (GPS) data (0.02-m accuracy) were used to generate grid digital elevation models (DEMs) at 5-, 10-, and 30-m cell sizes. Relative differences betwe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
117
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
117
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher predictive quality of these multidirectional flow redistribution methods (Schmidt and Persson, 2003;Güntner et al, 2004;Pan et al, 2004;Erskine et al, 2006) raise the question whether there are any advantages for computing flow distances too. Here we present a flow-path length algorithm that takes divergent flow into account.…”
Section: Hillslope Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher predictive quality of these multidirectional flow redistribution methods (Schmidt and Persson, 2003;Güntner et al, 2004;Pan et al, 2004;Erskine et al, 2006) raise the question whether there are any advantages for computing flow distances too. Here we present a flow-path length algorithm that takes divergent flow into account.…”
Section: Hillslope Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean snow depth for each 1 m 2 elevation band with > 100 m 2 area was computed from the snow-depth grid. Additionally, a 5 m elevation model, aggregated from the 1 m 2 bare-earth model, was produced to remove scaling biases in the analysis of slope and aspect (Kienzle, 2004;Erskine et al, 2006).…”
Section: Lidar Altimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternate routing methods, based upon MFD, have been proposed such as DEMON [18] and D ∞ [19]. The relative merits of these methods were discussed by Erskine [20] and although it is acknowledged that MFD produces more realistic drainage patterns in certain areas, the computational overhead introduced, especially for large DEMs, has seen it largely ignored in favour of the more efficient SFD. The influence of routing choice on LEM outcome is, however, unequivocal [21].…”
Section: Addressing the Flow Routing And Accumulation Problem Onmentioning
confidence: 99%