2016 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/wispnet.2016.7566480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of GSTEB, HEED and PEGASIS protocols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the CH is far from the BS, its energy consumption decreases rapidly. In [23], the GSTEB protocol can reduce the energy consumption of the network better by organizing nodes with low energy power automatically through a routing tree that is created for each round. Compared with the HEED protocol and the PEGASIS protocol, the GSTEB protocol has better network performance in reducing the energy consumption.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the CH is far from the BS, its energy consumption decreases rapidly. In [23], the GSTEB protocol can reduce the energy consumption of the network better by organizing nodes with low energy power automatically through a routing tree that is created for each round. Compared with the HEED protocol and the PEGASIS protocol, the GSTEB protocol has better network performance in reducing the energy consumption.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here before passing the information to the adjacent neighbor data aggregation takes place. PEGASIS performs better than LEACH [5] by removing overhead of forming clusters dynamically. When a node fails node is reconstructed.…”
Section: Pegasis(power Efficient Gathering In Sensor Information Smentioning
confidence: 99%