1984
DOI: 10.2307/3801198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Habitat Use by Migrant Soras and Virginia Rails

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found Virginia Rails selected for perennial moist soil plant habitat, including perennial Polygonum and Eleocharis spp., which is in line with previous work [14]. Virginia Rail water depth selection has varied in previous research findings with median values ranging from 2.4 to 19 cm [11,[14][15]. We did not find that Virginia Rails selected for water depths different than were available, but we note that available water depths in our study wetlands were similar to the range of values reported in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We found Virginia Rails selected for perennial moist soil plant habitat, including perennial Polygonum and Eleocharis spp., which is in line with previous work [14]. Virginia Rail water depth selection has varied in previous research findings with median values ranging from 2.4 to 19 cm [11,[14][15]. We did not find that Virginia Rails selected for water depths different than were available, but we note that available water depths in our study wetlands were similar to the range of values reported in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…[24]. We measured these variables because they have been found to be important to migrating rails [6,7,11,[14][15][16].…”
Section: Habitat Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, some studies have examined the effects of different landscape-level variables on habitat use such as degree of isolation (Brown and Dinsmore 1986, Craig and Beal 1992, Fairbairn and Dinsmore 2001, wetland size (Brown and Dinsmore 1986, Craig and Beal 1992, Craig 2008, and adjacent land use (Smith and Chow-Fraser 2010). Other studies have evaluated the effects of localscale characteristics such as water-vegetation interspersion Malecki 2006, Rehm andBaldassarre 2007), vegetation density and height (Sayre and Rundle 1984, Lor and Malecki 2006, Darrah and Krementz 2010, and water level and fluctuation (GonzalezGajardo et al 2009). Little research, however, has utilized occupancy models to evaluate how different habitat characteristics affect the probability of marsh birds to occupy particular wetlands across Iowa when detection probability is <1 (Darrah andKrementz 2010, Bolenbaugh et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed quantitative descriptions about these subjects are scarce both for Water Rail (Jenkins & Ormerod 2002, De Kroon & Mommers 2002, as well as for other rail species (Sayre & Rundle 1984, Johnson & Dinsmore 1986, Reid 1989.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%