2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.tin.0000270131.48518.76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Handheld to Metabolic Cart Indirect Calorimetry for Resting Energy Expenditure Assessment in Extremely Obese Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exclusion criteria have been described previously (5). The study was approved by the IRB at the UMN, and subjects gave written, informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Exclusion criteria have been described previously (5). The study was approved by the IRB at the UMN, and subjects gave written, informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subject preparation and testing procedures have been described elsewhere (5). DTC measurements spanned 20 minutes and the first five minutes were discarded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IC was used in three studies to compare measured and predicted energy expenditure (23–25). One study made a comparison between energy expenditure by handheld IC vs. metabolic cart (26). The remaining articles were studies among morbidly obese patients that used IC methodologies before and after surgical or weight loss intervention or exercise testing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies in healthy populations of all ages show handheld calorimeters are accurate (± 1%) compared to the metabolic cart 11 15 . However, studies conducted in hospitalized patients and field studies in developing countries identified disparities of up to ± 300 calories when REE measured by handheld calorimeter was compared with the metabolic cart 16 19 . Accurate measurement with a handheld calorimeter requires a trained staff as well as patient adherence to testing procedures.…”
Section: Predictive Equations Used To Compare Energy Expenditure In 1mentioning
confidence: 99%