2017
DOI: 10.1097/mjt.0000000000000366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunosuppressive Therapy for the Treatment of Acquired Severe Aplastic Anemia in Pediatric Patients

Abstract: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HHCT) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) for the treatment of pediatric acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA). The clinical data of 28 children with SAA treated from June 2010 to October 2014 at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Of these patients, 18 were treated with HHCT and 10 with IST. The median follow-up time was 23.5 months (range, 3-52 months). There was no significant differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent finding suggests that the OS of haplo-HSCT in pediatric SAA is comparable to IST. 29 Long-term FFS of the upfront therapy group in our trial was much better than that of IST mentioned above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…A recent finding suggests that the OS of haplo-HSCT in pediatric SAA is comparable to IST. 29 Long-term FFS of the upfront therapy group in our trial was much better than that of IST mentioned above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Our results show no significant difference in 3-year OS between the frontline IST and frontline haplo-HSCT groups (79.3 § 7.5% versus 85.0 § 8.0%; x 2 = .110; P = .740); however, FFS was significantly higher in the haplo-HSCT group compared with the IST group (80.0 § 8.9% versus 35.9 § 10.9%; x 2 = 4.089; P = .043) and EFS was significantly higher in the haplo-HSCT group compared with the salvage HSCT group (80.0 § 8.9% versus 41.7 § 14.2%; x 2 = 3.992; P = .046). Zhang et al [18] compared the prognosis of 28 children with SAA treated with haplo-HSCT and IST and found OS rates of 66.7% and 70.0%, respectively (P not significant). These results are similar to our present findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HLA-haploidentical relative HSCT has been greatly improved during the past decade 10 , 11 . Many cases of mismatched related donor transplants in SAA patients have been reported 9 , 12 21 . The latest 2015 British AA guidelines recommended alternative donor HSCT as an experimental treatment for patients who lacked suitably matched donors 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%