2012
DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0b013e3182328045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors With Quality of Life in the General US Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
126
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
17
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 Debulking up to 90% of tumour burden, even with positive margins, has been shown to be beneficial for symptom relief. 6 In the present study, 9 patients were identified who did not meet criteria for standard resections owing to the diffuse nature of their liver metastases but who were increasingly symptomatic, despite systemic therapies, secondary to their disease burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Debulking up to 90% of tumour burden, even with positive margins, has been shown to be beneficial for symptom relief. 6 In the present study, 9 patients were identified who did not meet criteria for standard resections owing to the diffuse nature of their liver metastases but who were increasingly symptomatic, despite systemic therapies, secondary to their disease burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to deployment with a representative sample of the U.S. population (Craig et al, 2014), the instrument has successfully measured HRQoL in chiropractic patients (Alcantara, Ohm, and Alcantara, 2016) and people with neuroendocrine tumors (Beaumont et al, 2012;Pearman et al, 2016), systemic sclerosis (Hinchcliff et al, 2011), irritable bowel syndrome (IsHak et al, 2017), rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis (Katz, Pedro, and Michaud, 2017), systemic lupus erythematosus (Lai et al, 2017), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (Schnall et al, 2017), among other populations. In prior testing, the PROMIS-29 has also been administered in a variety of settings (e.g., at the patient's home or in a medical clinic) and by a variety of methods (e.g., online or via paper and pencil).…”
Section: Previous Testing and Use Of The Patient-reported Outcomes Mementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construct validity of the PROMIS-29 has already been extensively evaluated in many populations (Alcantara, Ohm, and Alcantara, 2016;Beaumont et al, 2012;Craig et al, 2014;Hinchcliff et al, 2011;IsHak et al, 2017;Katz, Pedro, and Michaud, 2017;Lai et al, 2017;Pearman et al, 2016;Schnall et al, 2017), but never in a population of such advanced age and high illness burden. We examined criterion validity for PROMIS-29 measures in two ways.…”
Section: Question 6: Do the Risk-adjusted Patient-reported Outcomes Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Imaging involves one or a combination of modalities including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and radiolabeled somatostatin analogue scintigraphy using 99 Tc-labeled or 111 In-pentetreoide ( 111 In-DTPApentetreotide; Octreoscan) and in those negative on Octreoscan, Expression and identification of somatostatin receptors subtype 2A (SST-2A) is particularly useful in guiding imaging and predicting response to treatment with somatostatin analogues or peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). 35 Positron emission tomography-computed tomography with 18 F-flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging (PET-CT) is reserved for patients with undifferentiated and nonsecretory tumors due to their increased proliferative activity (Ki-67 index) or in patients with negative or equivocal imaging on 123 I-MIBG. 7,33 Endoscopic or percutaneous obtained biopsy is required for histopathology to confirm the diagnosis.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%