2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of hemodynamic and structural indices of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm as predicted by 2-way FSI, CFD rigid wall simulation and patient-specific displacement-based FEA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The wall deformation of the aorta under the action of the pulsatile blood flow has been pointed as crucial in computational models, due to the compliant properties of this structure (Azadani et al 2012). In fact, computational results obtained by FSI and computational fluid dynamics analysis may differ, as shown in (Mendez et al 2018), where distinct stress distributions and mean pressure values were emphasized. Therefore, it is important to have into account the deformation of the ascending aortic wall when modelling its hemodynamics.…”
Section: Fluid-structure Interaction Framework and Grid Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wall deformation of the aorta under the action of the pulsatile blood flow has been pointed as crucial in computational models, due to the compliant properties of this structure (Azadani et al 2012). In fact, computational results obtained by FSI and computational fluid dynamics analysis may differ, as shown in (Mendez et al 2018), where distinct stress distributions and mean pressure values were emphasized. Therefore, it is important to have into account the deformation of the ascending aortic wall when modelling its hemodynamics.…”
Section: Fluid-structure Interaction Framework and Grid Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Velocity streamlines in the ascending aorta [m/s] at peak systole (first row) and deceleration phase (second row). (Bonomi et al 2015;Cao et al 2017;Kimura et al 2017) and dilated aortas (Bonomi et al 2015;Pasta et al 2013;Mendez et al 2018;Kimura et al 2017), trying to identify the pathological disturbances that lead to aortic dilation and its progress in these patients. We modelled the interaction between blood and the aortic wall, but not between blood and the valve leaflets.…”
Section: Design Framework and Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow rate in 3.5mm parent artery is 2.88ml/s with the constant inlet velocity of 0.3 m/s and the viscosity of the blood is taken as 0.004 Pa-s [24]. Wall is assumed to be rigid [25] and the no-slip condition is applied at the wall. Poiseuille velocity profile was applied at the inlet and zero pressure at the outlet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, studies using rigid walls revealed that patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) have complex blood flow patterns that cause higher and uneven wall shear stresses, increasing the potential for TAA formation (Youssefi et al, 2017;Condemi et al, 2018;Edlin et al, 2019). Mendez et al (2018) simulated blood flow in BAV TAAs using both rigid walls and FSI, finding non-significant differences in helical flow, but significantly lower estimated pressure in CFD simulations. In particular, they found the largest differences between rigid and deformable wall simulations occur during peak systole when wall deformation is greatest.…”
Section: Thoracic Aortic Aneurysmsmentioning
confidence: 99%