2007 29th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces 2007
DOI: 10.1109/iti.2007.4283867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Heuristic Algorithms for the N-Queen Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…K. D. Crawford in [2], applied Genetic Algorithm and have discussed two ways to solve n-Queen problem. Ivica et al provided a comparison of different heuristic techniques in [1]. The techniques include Simulated Annealing, Tabu Search and Genetic Algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K. D. Crawford in [2], applied Genetic Algorithm and have discussed two ways to solve n-Queen problem. Ivica et al provided a comparison of different heuristic techniques in [1]. The techniques include Simulated Annealing, Tabu Search and Genetic Algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heuristic algorithms have been presented and compared, using such techniques as simulated annealing, tabu search, and genetic algorithms [4]. Recent methods involve particle swarm optimization, dynamic load distribution, ant colony optimization, gravitational search algorithms, and other recently developed techniques [5].…”
Section: Fig 1 One Solution For the Non-attacking N-queens Problem mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A witnessing solution can be constructed easily (Bell & Stevens, 2009) but note that the witness (a set of n queens) requires n log n bits to specify but this is not polynomial in the size of the input, which is only log n bits. The n-Queens problem has often been incorrectly called NP-hard, even in well-cited papers (Mandziuk, 1995;Martinjak & Golub, 2007;ShahHosseini, 2009;Nakaguchi, Kenya, & Tanaka, 1999, each with at least 29 citations). The counting version of the problem, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%