2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of home sleep apnea testing versus laboratory polysomnography for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
10

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
44
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…considered 240 min of artifact‐free signal sufficient for a successful study (Goodwin et al., ) and Scalzitti et al. set the limit at 360 min (Scalzitti, Hansen, Maturo, Lospinoso, & O'connor, ). We defined an acceptable study as 180 min of interpretable data from three leads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…considered 240 min of artifact‐free signal sufficient for a successful study (Goodwin et al., ) and Scalzitti et al. set the limit at 360 min (Scalzitti, Hansen, Maturo, Lospinoso, & O'connor, ). We defined an acceptable study as 180 min of interpretable data from three leads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No clear criteria exist regarding the minimum duration of recordings in sleep apnea evaluation in children and definitions of acceptable and successful recordings vary greatly (Poels et al, 2003). Goodwin et al consid-ered 240 min of artifact-free signal sufficient for a successful study (Goodwin et al, 2001) and Scalzitti et al set the limit at 360 min (Scalzitti, Hansen, Maturo, Lospinoso, & O'connor, 2017). We defined an acceptable study as 180 min of interpretable data from three leads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, estimation of OSA severity by a limited channel PSG study may underestimate OAHI when based on total recording time (ie, without an EEG‐based measure of sleep), rather than total sleep time . In addition, while home sleep studies are less expensive than in‐lab PSG, they still require the setup of technically complex diagnostic equipment as well as expert interpretation of the acquired data.…”
Section: Home Sleep Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, studies that have shown successful data acquisition and good correlation with laboratory PSG are those that have utilized a professionally trained technician or nurse to perform the initial setup of the device . When attempts at caregiver setup have been made, the results have been far less successful in obtaining accurate diagnostic information . Recently, comparison of a commercially available, caregiver‐applied home sleep apnea test with in‐laboratory PSG in 33 children revealed a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 83% for diagnosing OSA, but this degree of accuracy required two nights of home use of the monitor .…”
Section: Identifying Obstructive Sleep Apneamentioning
confidence: 99%