2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of household consumption and regional production approaches to assess urban energy use and implications for policy

Abstract: together to compare selected outputs for consistency, to identify complementarities and discuss the insight each approach brings to assessing and understanding urban 2 energy. Melbourne is an established and relatively affluent city with a significant manufacturing and heavy industry sector. The IO method captures the direct and embodied energy requirements of local household expenditure while the regional assessment more directly accounts for local production activity. IO analysis of the geography of Melbourn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
56
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Larsen and Hertwich have developed a local assessment model for Trondheim, Norway using a similar argument; that a consumption-based model would provide better information for local action [61]. Other local assessment approaches in recent years include e.g., Erickson et al, Baynes et al and Lenzen et al [43,62,63]. Satterthwaite further discusses the significance of the allocation perspective of the emissions on the assessment results, which highlight the problematic situation of current city level GHG assessment methods [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larsen and Hertwich have developed a local assessment model for Trondheim, Norway using a similar argument; that a consumption-based model would provide better information for local action [61]. Other local assessment approaches in recent years include e.g., Erickson et al, Baynes et al and Lenzen et al [43,62,63]. Satterthwaite further discusses the significance of the allocation perspective of the emissions on the assessment results, which highlight the problematic situation of current city level GHG assessment methods [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morlet;Keirstead, 2013. Battaglin;Lobo, 2002;GUIA TÉCNICO Procel-GEM, 2004;Saidel, 2005. Baynes et al, 2011Hill, 2009.…”
Section: Quadro 1 -Conceitos De Gestão Energética Descentralizadamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 FAILING, 1994;SADOWNIK et al, 1999;JANK, 2000;LOBO, 2002;IEA, 2004;HIREMATH et al, 2007;HIREMATH et al, 2010;NISSING et al, 2010;BAYNES et al, 2011;SPERLING et al, 2011;BALE et al, 2012;PARAG et al, 2012;MORLET et al, 2013;SAMPAIO et al, 2013; CHMUTINA, 2014.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Novas significações não só para a participação, mas também para o planejamento público (CRANTSCHANINOV, 2013 15 FAILING, 1995;SADOWNIK et al, 2001;JANK, 2000;BATTAGLIN, LOBO, 2002;IEA, 2004;HIREMATH et al, 2007;HIREMATH et al, 2010;NISSING, BLOTTNITZ, 2010.;BAYNES et al, 2011;SPERLING, HVELPLUND,VAD MATHIESEN, 2011.;BALE et al, 2012;PARAG et al, 2013;MORLET, KEIRSTEAD, 2013.;SAMPAIO, 2013;CHMUTINA, GOODIER, 2014. No entanto, cada um dos termos referidos possui diferenças em seus focos …”
Section: Programas Internacionaisunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation