1996
DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(95)00284-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of hydrocracking reactivities of coal extracts from a flowing-solvent reactor, a mini-bomb and a pilot plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydrocracked product was prepared in a microbomb reactor at 460 °C (60 min, 190 bar H 2 pressure), in the presence of a supported NiMo/Al 2 O 3 catalyst with tetralin as donor solvent. Both samples have been described in detail elsewhere. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Hydrocracked product was prepared in a microbomb reactor at 460 °C (60 min, 190 bar H 2 pressure), in the presence of a supported NiMo/Al 2 O 3 catalyst with tetralin as donor solvent. Both samples have been described in detail elsewhere. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both samples have been described in detail elsewhere. [20][21][22][23] Mass Spectrometry. A Bio Ion 20 252 Cf-plasma desorption, time-of-flight mass spectrometer was used to obtain molecular mass distributions of the samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations