2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of hydrokinetic energy harvesting performance of a fluttering hydrofoil against other Flow-Induced Vibration (FIV) mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The galloping vibration in Case 1 has been observed in previous studies and we note significant similarities between galloping in Case 1 and flow-induced pitching and heaving of an airfoil reported in earlier studies (Tamimi et al. 2022). However, the galloping vibrations in Case 3 are significantly different and have not been observed earlier. In Case 2, the modal amplitude ratio () can be effectively utilized to attain an undamped FIV suppression due to the self-limiting characteristics of the tandem cylinder FIV amplitudes. In Case 3, out-of-phase vibrating tandem cylinders of Case 3 indicate a higher energy harvesting potential with a single energy harvesting unit, as compared with the uncoupled tandem cylinders in Case 1 with two energy harvesting units.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The galloping vibration in Case 1 has been observed in previous studies and we note significant similarities between galloping in Case 1 and flow-induced pitching and heaving of an airfoil reported in earlier studies (Tamimi et al. 2022). However, the galloping vibrations in Case 3 are significantly different and have not been observed earlier. In Case 2, the modal amplitude ratio () can be effectively utilized to attain an undamped FIV suppression due to the self-limiting characteristics of the tandem cylinder FIV amplitudes. In Case 3, out-of-phase vibrating tandem cylinders of Case 3 indicate a higher energy harvesting potential with a single energy harvesting unit, as compared with the uncoupled tandem cylinders in Case 1 with two energy harvesting units.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Tamimi et al. (2022) reported a similar galloping response of a pitching-heaving airfoil.
Figure 21.Schematic description of the mechanism of galloping for ( a ) Case 1, ( b ) Case 2 and ( c ) Case 3.
…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2020; Tamimi et al. 2022) and thin plates (Sodano, Inman & Park 2004; Dunnmon et al. 2011; Giacomello & Porfiri 2011; Xu-Xu, Barrero-Gil & Velazquez 2016; Qadri, Zhao & Tang 2020; Zhao et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TENGs are a field that effectively converts mechanical energy into electric power, and its working modes and material options are various. Many researchers have demonstrated the excellent harvesting energy ability of TENGs in the water flow environment. TENGs with different structural designs are used to harvest water flow energy, all of which require a certain flow velocity. Thereby, it is concerning that the energy harvesting of a TENG can be limited under low-flow velocity. Flow-induced vibration exists in abundant kinetic energy, which is a self-excitation vibration at low-flow velocity. TENG-based energy harvesting technology can convert hydrokinetic energy into electric power . The cross-sectional differences of the bluff body brings diverse vortex effects, which then have an impact on the performance output of the TENG.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%