Comparison of I-gel and Baska mask in elective surgery: a meta-analysis

Abstract

ObjectiveThe supraglottic airway device is a viable alternative to tracheal intubation for elective surgery. To conduct a comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages associated with use of the Baska mask and I-gel across various dimensions.DesignA comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and other relevant databases to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients who used the Baska mask and I-gel.Main resultsTwelve studies were identified for comparison of clinical indices. The Baska mask device demonstrated general feasibility in oropharyngeal leak pressure at insertion time and 30 min post-insertion, as well as in the assessment of dysphonia. However, the I-gel had superior efficacy in reducing sore throat compared with the Baska mask.ConclusionsBased on current evidence, the Baska mask demonstrates superior intraoperative performance compared with I-gel; however, it is associated with a higher incidence of a sore throat post-extubation. Nevertheless, the overall quality of existing studies is suboptimal, underscoring the need for additional high-quality RCTs to substantiate these findings.