2015
DOI: 10.5604/08606196.1152292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of identification methods of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in MALDI-TOF MS, Vitek 2 and API 20 STREP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[24, 26] However, our SBEAVM method was different from previous studies in several aspects. First, to increase the specificity of the BEAV method, two carbapenems were added to the broth to better inhibit growth of gram negative bacteria, in addition to the bile in BEAV which served as an inhibitor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[24, 26] However, our SBEAVM method was different from previous studies in several aspects. First, to increase the specificity of the BEAV method, two carbapenems were added to the broth to better inhibit growth of gram negative bacteria, in addition to the bile in BEAV which served as an inhibitor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, our comparator was ChromID VRE method, not conventional phenotypic identification,[ 24 ] Vitek 2 or API 20 STREP. [ 26 ] Third, the database we used for identification was Vitek v2.0, which is approved by the US Federal and Drug Administration for clinical use, while the database used in the previous study was for research use only. [ 24 ] In conclusion, our study proposed a better solution to VRE screening in the real world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation