1999
DOI: 10.1006/jsre.1998.5469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Ileal and Jejunal Transplantation after 50% Proximal Intestinal Resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2; Table 1) may reflect the local, transient hyperplastic effects of transection alone (49,52). We believe the ileum transection, which we and others (25,37) have used, is a more rigorous test of the adaptive response to resection, because the ileum has the greatest potential of adapting to take on the appearance of the jejunum, as reported in orally fed animals (44). However, we refrain from making comparisons between individual small bowel segments regarding the relative effects of resection on adaptive growth, because the location of the transection cut influences the baseline for interpretation of the magnitude of the results.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Early Time Course Of Intestinal Adaptation Andmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2; Table 1) may reflect the local, transient hyperplastic effects of transection alone (49,52). We believe the ileum transection, which we and others (25,37) have used, is a more rigorous test of the adaptive response to resection, because the ileum has the greatest potential of adapting to take on the appearance of the jejunum, as reported in orally fed animals (44). However, we refrain from making comparisons between individual small bowel segments regarding the relative effects of resection on adaptive growth, because the location of the transection cut influences the baseline for interpretation of the magnitude of the results.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Early Time Course Of Intestinal Adaptation Andmentioning
confidence: 97%