2013
DOI: 10.1364/josab.30.002665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of image-formation properties of coherent nonlinear microscopy by means of double-sided Feynman diagrams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is subject to CTF(0, 0, ) z f which depends both on the nonlinear optical process and on the NAs of the excitation and collection systems [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…is subject to CTF(0, 0, ) z f which depends both on the nonlinear optical process and on the NAs of the excitation and collection systems [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the factor F cosθ is nearly equal to 1 owing to the nearly-symmetric CTF. However, if the NA of the collection system is smaller than that of the excitation system in CARS microscopy, the CTF becomes asymmetric to some extent [20], which induces F cosθ to be smaller than 1. Figure 7 illustrates how the signals of THG and CARS microscopy build up in the case where the excitation beam is focused into the homogeneous medium through a higher-NA excitation system than the collection system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Confocal fluorescence microscopy harnesses fluorescence as an optical process to increase the optical resolution, compared with microscopy with a χ (1) -derived optical process. Confocal microscopy that utilizes a χ (1) -derived optical process has a resolution limit (frequency cutoff) of NA ex /λ ex + NA col /λ ex , where λ ex is the wavelength of the excitation beam, NA ex is the numerical aperture of the objective in the excitation system, and NA col is the numerical aperture of the objective in the signal-collection system [3,4], while confocal fluorescence microscopy theoretically indicates the resolution limit of 2NA ex /λ ex + 2 NA col /λ fl , where λ fl is the wavelength of the fluorescence. Note that in conventional (wide field) fluorescence microscopy, since the entire specimen is excited evenly, which corresponds to the condition NA ex = 0, the resolution limit becomes 2 NA col /λ fl .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%