2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2016.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of immunity-based schemes for aircraft failure detection and identification

Abstract: In this paper, two approaches are proposed and compared for the detection and identification of aircraft subsystem failures based on the artificial immune system paradigm combined with the hierarchical multiself strategy. The first approach relies on the heuristic ranking of lower order self/non-self projections and the generation of selective immunity identifiers through structuring of the non-self. The second approach is based on an information processing algorithm inspired by the functionality of the dendri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For future work, because the failure has happened suddenly, the failure self-detection which is integrated into the controller design framework by employing the disturbance observer, 24 immunity-based schemes 25 should be considered. Furthermore, the failure detection and the corresponding safety control problem in case of low-altitude airdrop should be considered since the aircraft's attitude variation in low altitude is intolerable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For future work, because the failure has happened suddenly, the failure self-detection which is integrated into the controller design framework by employing the disturbance observer, 24 immunity-based schemes 25 should be considered. Furthermore, the failure detection and the corresponding safety control problem in case of low-altitude airdrop should be considered since the aircraft's attitude variation in low altitude is intolerable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI and machine learning (ML) have been widely used in different engineering applications such as structural health monitoring (Al Azzawi et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2011;Saeidpour et al, 2018;Salehi and Burgueno, 2018;Salehi et al, 2018aSalehi et al, ,b, 2019aSantos et al, 2016;Silva et al, 2016;Wootton et al, 2017) and fatigue crack detection Rovinelli et al, 2018). ML algorithms, in the context of failure analysis, have been used for numerous applications, including phase-field models of polymer-based dielectrics (Shen et al, 2019), phase-field models of solidification (Yabansu et al, 2017), and crystal plasticity (Papanikolaou et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI and machine learning (ML) have been widely used in different engineering applications such as structural health monitoring [26,39,1,43,52,32,34,36,35,37,33] and fatigue crack detection [31,24,23]. ML algorithms, in the context of failure analysis, have been used for numerous applications, including phase-field models of polymer-based dielectrics [42], phase-field models of solidification [53], and crystal plasticity [30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%