2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-5814(12)32007-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of immunoglobulin free light chain (FLC), heavy chain/light chain (HLC) assays and immunofixation (IFE) in assessment of remission in multiple myeloma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PFS in this group of patients was 24 months vs. 12 months (p < 0.07) in patients with CR, VGPR and PR [18].…”
Section: Prognostic Value Of Hlc and Flc Assays In Monoclonal Gammopamentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PFS in this group of patients was 24 months vs. 12 months (p < 0.07) in patients with CR, VGPR and PR [18].…”
Section: Prognostic Value Of Hlc and Flc Assays In Monoclonal Gammopamentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In all IgA MM patients concordance of 3 tests (IFE negative, HLC ratio normal, FLC ratio normal) was found. Discrepancy between IFE and HLC and FLC results (IFE positive, HLC ratio normal, FLC ratio normal) was found in patients with IgG MM [18].…”
Section: Comparison Of Hlc Flc and Ife In Assessment Of Remission In MMmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Clinically applied assay ("IgM Hevylite immunoassay") for monoclonality identification, prognosis prediction and monitoring response to treatment in multiple myeloma has recently been developed [10] and justified as a reliable progression marker in the monitoring of monoclonal gammopathies but not suited for diagnostics [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. It relies on antibody binding to the epitopes spanning the junctional regions between either k or l light chain and their respective heavy chain partners.…”
Section: Monitoring Of Igm-mm and Wm Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%