2012
DOI: 10.4172/2161-1009.1000119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Of Immunonephelometric And Immunoturbidimetric Methods for Measuring Beta 2-Microglobulin: Fit for Purpose in Routine Clinical Laboratories

Abstract: Serum free beta 2-microglobulin (b2M) level has been regarded as an independent biomarker in several cancers, and has traditionally been analyzed using methods such as Immunonephelometry on specialized analyzers. It is now possible to perform this test on clinical chemistry analyzers, using immunoturbidimetry. The aim of this study was to compare these two methods, for measuring serum b2M level. Fourty three samples which were randomly chosen from sera of patients with various malignant conditions were analyze… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…bTP and b2M measurements were carried out using nephelometric and turbidimetric techniques, respectively. Alternative methods are available for both proteins, 32,33 and variation between different assays may therefore limit applicability of our equations. Additionally, although the precision of both assays seems robust in non-uremic serum, we cannot exclude the potential interference of the assay by toxins related to advanced uremia or the dialysis procedure;…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bTP and b2M measurements were carried out using nephelometric and turbidimetric techniques, respectively. Alternative methods are available for both proteins, 32,33 and variation between different assays may therefore limit applicability of our equations. Additionally, although the precision of both assays seems robust in non-uremic serum, we cannot exclude the potential interference of the assay by toxins related to advanced uremia or the dialysis procedure;…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%