2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-5288(03)00143-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of in vitro activities of biotransformation enzymes in pig, cattle, goat and sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
81
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
10
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Monshouwer et al (1998) and Anzenbacher et al (1998) could not detect PROD activity in cultured pig hepatocytes and minipig liver microsomes, respectively. The possible reasons for those disagreements between different studies are discussed elsewhere (Szotá ková et al, 2004). Activities of COH and PNPH in the present study were approximately within the activity range reported earlier (Zamaratskaia et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, Monshouwer et al (1998) and Anzenbacher et al (1998) could not detect PROD activity in cultured pig hepatocytes and minipig liver microsomes, respectively. The possible reasons for those disagreements between different studies are discussed elsewhere (Szotá ková et al, 2004). Activities of COH and PNPH in the present study were approximately within the activity range reported earlier (Zamaratskaia et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…First, general knowledge about the effects of industrial pollutants and pharmacologically active substances is important in veterinary science (Szotá ková et al, 2004). Second, CYP450 in food-producing animals, including pigs, are crucial in the regulation of the amounts of drugs and other chemicals in animal tissues and possibly food products for human consumption and animal feeding stuffs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that there are significant species variations regarding the elimination kinetics of several drugs (Shukla et al, 2007). Szotakova et al, (2004) have demonstrated marked differences in the in vitro activities of biotransformation enzymes among animal species. Plasma from human, mouse, porcine and rat was used in these studies in order to evaluate the in vitro stability of the HDACIs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have mapped out the molecular biology of this superfamily and nowadays it can be divided into many subfamilies, each of which (particularly those belonging to numbers 1 to 4) is linked to a different set of drugs [33,56]; moreover, numerous investigators have identified the substrate specificities of each single isoform [33]. Recently, some studies which report the metabolism of substrates as models for specific enzymatic pathways in liver preparations of farm animals have been published too [29,37,49,55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%