2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5173(00)00554-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles by ANOVA-based, model-dependent and -independent methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
175
0
10

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
175
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The dissolution profiles of the generic drug products A and B vs. reference were compared by model-independent,-dependent and analysis of variance (ANOVA)-based methods [12,17]. For modelindependent comparisons, the f2 similarity factor, mean dissolution time (MDT), and dissolution efficiency (DE) were calculated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dissolution profiles of the generic drug products A and B vs. reference were compared by model-independent,-dependent and analysis of variance (ANOVA)-based methods [12,17]. For modelindependent comparisons, the f2 similarity factor, mean dissolution time (MDT), and dissolution efficiency (DE) were calculated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model with the highest adjusted determination coefficient (R 2 adjusted) and the minimum Akaike information criterion (AIC) was chosen as the best fit model [17]. Data analysis was performed using the Excel add-in DDSolver.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each time of withdrawal, 5 ml of fresh medium was replaced into the dissolution flask, to maintain the sink condition. The release of the prepared gastro retentive formulations was compared with the theoretical release of the drug by calculating similarity and dissimilarity factor [27,28].…”
Section: Drug Release Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Weibull linear relationship was obtained by log-log plot of time versus -ln (1-m), where m is the cumulative fraction of drug dissolved over a time t (Manadas et al, 2002;Yukse et al, 2000).…”
Section: Dissolution Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%