2005
DOI: 10.17221/3996-cjas
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of in vitro gas production technique with in situ nylon bag technique to estimate dry matter degradation

Abstract: Dry matter (DM) degradation of wheat straw (WS), barley straw (BS), lucerne hay (LH) and maize silage (MS) was determined using two different techniques: (i) in vitro gas production and (ii) nylon bag degradability technique. In vitro gas production and in situ DM disappearance were measured after 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours of incubation. In situ and in vitro DM degradation kinetics was described using the equation y = a + b (1 -e ct ). In all incubations there were significant (P < 0.001) correlation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
23
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
23
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the potentially degradable (a + b), and c fraction as well as the ED at 0.02 and 0.05 passage rates of DM for WS were identical to those reported in [30]. However, the value of a fraction of DM for WS is lower and that of b higher in the studies of [31] and [30] than in the current study. The OM a fraction for WS is similar to that reported by [30] while b, c fraction and ED are lower in the present study.…”
Section: In Situ Degradability Parameters and Effective Degradabilitysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, the potentially degradable (a + b), and c fraction as well as the ED at 0.02 and 0.05 passage rates of DM for WS were identical to those reported in [30]. However, the value of a fraction of DM for WS is lower and that of b higher in the studies of [31] and [30] than in the current study. The OM a fraction for WS is similar to that reported by [30] while b, c fraction and ED are lower in the present study.…”
Section: In Situ Degradability Parameters and Effective Degradabilitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The values of b fraction and ED of DM for BS are different from those reported by [31] and [30]. The OM a, b fractions and ED for BS are lower than those reported by [30].…”
Section: In Situ Degradability Parameters and Effective Degradabilitycontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Anaerobic degradability of organic matter of cattle faeces and a possibility of its utilization 2005a,b), degradation of feed organic matter by in vitro and in situ nylon-bag methods with measurement of gas production and description of the process kinetics (Kamalak et al, 2005). Degradability of organic matter in other disciplines is investigated particularly from the aspect of resistance in acid hydrolysis (Rovira and Vallejo, 2002;Shirato and Yokozava, 2006) or in oxidation (Blair et al, 1995;Chan et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a lack of information about ruminal degradability of dry matter (DM) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF) of the most important grass species grown in European countries. The rate and extent of DM fermentation in the rumen are crucial determinants of the nutrients utilized by ruminants (Kamalak et al, 2005). The main factor influencing the rate of fermentation of feeds is the structure of the carbohydrate fraction, especially the extent of lignification of the cell wall (Nagadi et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%