2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of in vivo genotoxic and carcinogenic potency to augment mode of action analysis: Case study with hexavalent chromium

Abstract: Recent analyses-highlighted by the International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing Working Group on Quantitative Approaches to Genetic Toxicology Risk Assessment-have identified a correlation between (log) estimates of a carcinogen's in vivo genotoxic potency and in vivo carcinogenic potency in typical laboratory animal models, even when the underlying data have not been matched for tissue, species, or strain. Such a correlation could have important implications for risk assessment, including informing the mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, several regulatory bodies have developed threshold-based oral toxicity values and/or water standards for Cr(VI) using data described in the review articles cited herein (FSCJ, 2019;Health Canada, 2016;TCEQ, 2016;WHO, 2020). Thompson et al (2016) previously raised issues related to the inclusion of Cr(VI) in analyses by Soeteman-Hernandez et al (2016), and do so again regarding the important analyses in Chepelev et al (2023).…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, several regulatory bodies have developed threshold-based oral toxicity values and/or water standards for Cr(VI) using data described in the review articles cited herein (FSCJ, 2019;Health Canada, 2016;TCEQ, 2016;WHO, 2020). Thompson et al (2016) previously raised issues related to the inclusion of Cr(VI) in analyses by Soeteman-Hernandez et al (2016), and do so again regarding the important analyses in Chepelev et al (2023).…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The study expands upon previous important work investigating the relationship between carcinogenic and genotoxic potency of several carcinogens (Soeteman-Hernandez et al, 2016). We were surprised to find sodium dichromate (i.e., hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)]) among the 48 chemicals investigated by Chepelev et al despite our previous publication highlighting issues with the inclusion of Cr(VI) in Soeteman-Hernandez et al (2016), including the choice of genotoxic endpoint and data indicating that the genotoxic potency of Cr(VI) is likely lower (i.e., higher benchmark dose) than the carcinogenic potency (Thompson et al, 2016). Cr(VI) is a site of contact carcinogen in rodents following oral exposure, inducing tumors in the oral cavity of rats and small intestine of mice (NTP, 2008).…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromium compounds are highly toxic to humans, primarily hexavalent chromium (Cr +6 ). The main manifestations of excess Cr are inflammatory diseases with a tendency to ulceration of the mucous membranes, an allergic effect, dermatitis and eczema, bronchial asthma, and risk of cancer [178,179].…”
Section: Curcumin On Chromium-induced Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Олар өз кезегінде жүрек камераларының және тамырлар қабырғаларының қайта құрылуына әкелуі мүмкін екендігі болжанады [8,9,10,11]. Осы сипатталған өзгерістерге ұқсас ерекшеліктер, тәжірибелік жағдайда хром қосындыларының әсерінде көрініс табатындығы бірқатар зерттеулерде анықталған [12,13]. Мүшелердің функционалдық қабілеті жоғарылау жағдайында, зат алмасу үдерісінің артуы қызметтік капиллярлар санының көбеюіне әкеледі.…”
Section: S U M M a R Y Comparative Analysis Of The Lindane And Sodiumunclassified