2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of In Vivo Patellofemoral Kinematics for Subjects Having High-Flexion Total Knee Arthroplasty Implant With Patients Having Normal Knees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
24
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Postoperative PC at maximum extension was significantly higher, and postoperative PC at 90°was significantly lower compared to before surgery (*p<0.05). OA pre-operative data, MP postoperative data patellofemoral kinematics, especially in PC, and differed from those of previous reports on PS and cruciate-retaining design [10,11].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Postoperative PC at maximum extension was significantly higher, and postoperative PC at 90°was significantly lower compared to before surgery (*p<0.05). OA pre-operative data, MP postoperative data patellofemoral kinematics, especially in PC, and differed from those of previous reports on PS and cruciate-retaining design [10,11].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The flexion angle was measured on the X-ray images and was defined as the angle made by the longitudinal axes of the femur and tibial long bones [9]. Thereafter, patella flexion angle (PF), tibiopatellar angle (TP) and estimated patellofemoral contact point (PC) were evaluated, according to a previously reported method [10,11] (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another important reason could be considered from the viewpoint of femoro-tibial kinematics and joint gap theory [30,35,36]. Komistek et al pointed out that femoro-tibial kinematics can play a major role in patellofemoral kinematics [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, direct comparison of the postoperative prosthesis orientation with the conditions before operation is difficult. Although X-ray, CT and MRI as methods of evaluation have been assessed in many reports [29][30][31], there are some weaknesses in these methods. Although a 2D-3D registration technique, combined with fluoroscopic analysis, has been used to assess postoperative tibio-femoral joint kinematics with high accuracy [32], limitations remain for assessing the PF joint [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%