2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of infrared thermography, ground-penetrating radar and ultrasonic pulse echo for detecting delaminations in concrete bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An ultrasonic wave (UW) test was performed on the samples before and after heating, as shown in Figure 4. The change in the ultrasonic wave can reflect the internal element before the heat, then show the internal degradation of the concrete sample after the heat, therefore, indicating the internal change in the sample and predicting its failure [21,22] .…”
Section: Experimental Set-up and Test Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ultrasonic wave (UW) test was performed on the samples before and after heating, as shown in Figure 4. The change in the ultrasonic wave can reflect the internal element before the heat, then show the internal degradation of the concrete sample after the heat, therefore, indicating the internal change in the sample and predicting its failure [21,22] .…”
Section: Experimental Set-up and Test Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ensuring safe and long-term use of concrete structures and elements requires, among other things, appropriate diagnostics. It can use destructive testing (e.g., by testing the strength of drilled cores [1,2]), semi-destructive testing (e.g., pull-out [1,3], pull-off [4,5] methods) and non-destructive testing (NDT, e.g., using sclerometer tests [1,3,6], thermal imaging techniques [7,8], analysis of natural frequencies [9,10], stereological investigations [11], acoustic emission [12,13], X-ray tomography [12], ground-penetrating radars [7,14,15], ultrasound [1,3,7,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] including ultrasound tomography [15,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25]). The choice of method depends on the material characteristics that we want or are able to measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in PT and SHT methods, the cooling time is more important in comparison with heating time to extract the defect information. Up to the present, the SHT has been proven as an effective NDT method to identify not only delamination but also voids in concrete structures without CFRP (CWC structures) [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%