2019
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score and Trauma and Injury Severity Score for Mortality Prediction in Elderly Trauma Patients

Abstract: Objectives This study tests the accuracy of the Injury Severity Score (ISS), New Injury Severity Score (NISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS) and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) in prediction of mortality in cases of geriatric trauma. Design Prospective observational study Materials and methods This was a prospective observational study on two hundred elderly trauma patients who were admitted to JSS Hospital, Mysuru over a consecutive pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
77
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
77
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the AIS-head did not show a statistically significant difference (p = 0.437) between the groups, which means we dealt with similar groups of head-injury patients in both rehab strategies. With comparable AIS, the higher ISS in the AITR group indicates more polytrauma [ 14 – 16 ]. On the other hand, with more polytrauma, the AITR group had a significantly lower length of hospital stay (38.7 days vs. 52.4 days; p < 0.001), which favored the success of the AITR program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the AIS-head did not show a statistically significant difference (p = 0.437) between the groups, which means we dealt with similar groups of head-injury patients in both rehab strategies. With comparable AIS, the higher ISS in the AITR group indicates more polytrauma [ 14 – 16 ]. On the other hand, with more polytrauma, the AITR group had a significantly lower length of hospital stay (38.7 days vs. 52.4 days; p < 0.001), which favored the success of the AITR program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demographic characteristics and injury data were evaluated regarding age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), injury location, injury type and mechanism, accompanying traumas, and operations. The ISS is a scoring system based on anatomical regions that are used for assessing trauma severity in patients with multiple injuries [ 11 ]. Scores of <9 represent mild injuries, 9-15 moderate, 16-24 severe, and ≥25 profound.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of the squares of the highest AIS scores for the three most severely injured body regions equals the ISS. The ISS ranges from 1 to 75 and correlates most closely with morbidity and mortality [19]. The mechanism of injuries were also evaluated to compare GTPs to octogenarians, including falls, motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), pedestrian accidents, and motorcycle collisions (MCCs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%