2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2008.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of instrumental and GDGT-based estimates of sea surface and air temperatures from the Skagerrak

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
61
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
61
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Rueda et al (2009) compared instrumental temperature data with branched GDGT-derived MAAT estimates for a sediment core from the Skagerrak, off Norway, and found that MAAT values derived from the MBT and CBT were in closer agreement with summer than with annual air temperatures. It should nevertheless be noted that these data might be influenced by in situ production of branched GDGTs in the water column and/or marine sediments.…”
Section: Air Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Rueda et al (2009) compared instrumental temperature data with branched GDGT-derived MAAT estimates for a sediment core from the Skagerrak, off Norway, and found that MAAT values derived from the MBT and CBT were in closer agreement with summer than with annual air temperatures. It should nevertheless be noted that these data might be influenced by in situ production of branched GDGTs in the water column and/or marine sediments.…”
Section: Air Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MBT and CBT indices are increasingly used as palaeoenvironmental proxies and have been successfully applied to the reconstruction of past air temperatures in deltaic and coastal regions (e.g. the Congo fan, Weijers et al, 2007b; the North Sea, Donders et al, 2009;Rueda et al, 2009) and very recently in Chinese loess ) based on comparison with instrumental records and/or data obtained from other proxies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples collected from deep peat horizons gave GDGT-derived MAAT values lower than those collected from surficial horizons ( Table 2), implying that MAAT estimates derived from bacterial GDGTs could be in closer agreement with spring and summer soil temperature rather than with annual soil or air temperature. Similarly, Rueda et al (2009) one possible explanation could be that branched GDGT-synthesising bacteria are more active during summer than the rest of the year, since Scandinavian soils are snow-covered for several months. Such an explanation might also hold for the peat bog investigated in the present study, where soil temperature was observed to vary over a large range, whatever the depth (Table 3).…”
Section: Reconstruction Of Air Temperature and Peat Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MBT and CBT indices have recently been shown to be useful tools for the reconstruction of continental temperatures (e.g. Weijers et al, 2007b;Schouten et al, 2008;Rueda et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MBT/CBT proxy is one of the few quantitative temperature proxies that have been introduced for terrestrial environments. The MBT/CBT proxy has been used to reconstruct past MAAT changes in diverse settings: marine (e.g., Weijers et al, 2007b;Donders et al, 2009;Rueda et al, 2009;Bendle et al, 2010) and lacustrine (Tyler et al, 2010;Zink et al, 2010;Fawcett et al, 2011;Loomis et al, 2012;Niemann et al, 2012;D'Anjou et al, 2013) sediments, peat (Ballantyne et al, 2010), and loess deposits (Peterse et al, 2011a;Zech et al, 2012;Jia et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%