2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.resinv.2022.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of international and Japanese predictive equations for maximal respiratory mouth pressures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements were repeated at least three times, with a 30‐s recovery period between measurements, and the process was repeated until good reproducibility was achieved (within 10% difference between measurements). Values were also expressed as percentages of predicted values, which were calculated using the Japanese equation 15 . IMW was defined as MIP < 80% of the predicted value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measurements were repeated at least three times, with a 30‐s recovery period between measurements, and the process was repeated until good reproducibility was achieved (within 10% difference between measurements). Values were also expressed as percentages of predicted values, which were calculated using the Japanese equation 15 . IMW was defined as MIP < 80% of the predicted value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values were also expressed as percentages of predicted values, which were calculated using the Japanese equation. 15 IMW was defined as MIP < 80% of the predicted value.…”
Section: Inspiratory Muscle Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, absolute cut-off values defining respiratory muscle weakness were shown from the European region to be 62 and 83 cmH 2 O for MIP and 81 and 109 cmH 2 O for MEP in women and men, respectively [9 ▪ ]. Although many available prediction formulas for MIP and MEP have been reported, wide variations have been noted in the overall agreement among the formulas [10 ▪ ]. This wide variability can be attributed mainly to technical aspects (e.g., differences in protocols and equipment used), sample characteristics (e.g.…”
Section: Definition and Diagnostic Criteria Of Respiratory Sarcopeniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This wide variability can be attributed mainly to technical aspects (e.g., differences in protocols and equipment used), sample characteristics (e.g. age, anthropometry, and ethnicity), and differences in the explanatory variables in the equations [9 ▪ ,10 ▪ ]. Currently, no clear cut-off points for %MIP and %MEP to determine low respiratory muscle strength.…”
Section: Definition and Diagnostic Criteria Of Respiratory Sarcopeniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many formulas for calculating reference and normal values for MIP and MEP have been reported, including Enright et al, 14 each using different indices such as age, height, and weight. 49 Evans et al 50 present estimation equations for the reference and lower limit of normal. 4.…”
Section: Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%