2020
DOI: 10.1002/vzj2.20025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of interpolation methods for soil moisture prediction on China's Loess Plateau

Abstract: Due to limited in situ observations, prediction of large-scale soil moisture content (SMC) for deep soil layers via interpolation is usually very challenging. This is especially true for regions with high spatial variations of terrain features. For precise prediction at a regional scale, SMC data for the 0-to 500-cm soil profile across China's Loess Plateau (CLP) region were collected and interpolated using four different methods. The methods included inverse distance weighting (IDW), ordinary kriging (OK), mu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The map produced by the OK method smoothed out most of the local details. These findings were consistent with those of previous studies [82][83][84]. In the PTE estimation results produced by the EBK algorithm, we detected a more dramatic PTE variation in the study area.…”
Section: Spatial Prediction Accuracy Using Different Interpolation Mesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The map produced by the OK method smoothed out most of the local details. These findings were consistent with those of previous studies [82][83][84]. In the PTE estimation results produced by the EBK algorithm, we detected a more dramatic PTE variation in the study area.…”
Section: Spatial Prediction Accuracy Using Different Interpolation Mesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our research was conducted in a small area with homogeneous natural conditions; therefore, the density of samples and their distances are similar to previous studies. As was found in previous research (Xie et al, 2020), the IDW approach works well under uniform sample distribution due to the local variance, which is a driver of the estimated surface. RF accuracy for each interpolation is different, (even if the initial input dataset is the same) due to the “random nature” of the method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It is thus important to carefully consider these limitations and assumptions of cokriging before using it. Interpolation methods are increasingly being used as a tool to improve the estimation of SWC spatial distribution due to limited access to accurate observation data (Xie et al 2020). Since the MC-EMI VCP C1 gave the most accurate prediction from MLR, this coil orientation was used as a covariate for the interpolation of SWC using cokriging.…”
Section: Variography and Kriging Interpolated Surface Of Soil Water C...mentioning
confidence: 99%