2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2011.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of intracavitary brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy dose distribution for cervical cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Cengiz et al generated SBRT plans for 11 stage IIB cervical cancer patients and compared the dose distributions with those delivered using BT. The rectal dose to 1 cc (d 1cc ) was (5.09 vs. 6.05 Gy, P=0.02), the bladder d 1cc (6.78 vs. 8.76 Gy, P=0.04) and the median target coverage by the 100% isodose line was (99.1% vs. 50.7%, P<0.05); all favoring SBRT plans (the study however was limited by BT dose prescription to point A) (41). Similarly, the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) dosimetric plans [generated for 51 gynecologic cancer patients receiving the initial 45-50.4 Gy via three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and a boost of 6 Gy for maximum dose (d max ) with comparable bladder and bowel dose; however, the integral dose and the PTV coverage favored BT (44).…”
Section: Newer Techniques May Offer Dose Distribution Not Exceedinglymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Cengiz et al generated SBRT plans for 11 stage IIB cervical cancer patients and compared the dose distributions with those delivered using BT. The rectal dose to 1 cc (d 1cc ) was (5.09 vs. 6.05 Gy, P=0.02), the bladder d 1cc (6.78 vs. 8.76 Gy, P=0.04) and the median target coverage by the 100% isodose line was (99.1% vs. 50.7%, P<0.05); all favoring SBRT plans (the study however was limited by BT dose prescription to point A) (41). Similarly, the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) dosimetric plans [generated for 51 gynecologic cancer patients receiving the initial 45-50.4 Gy via three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and a boost of 6 Gy for maximum dose (d max ) with comparable bladder and bowel dose; however, the integral dose and the PTV coverage favored BT (44).…”
Section: Newer Techniques May Offer Dose Distribution Not Exceedinglymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A number of dosimetric studies advocated superior target coverage and sparing of organs at risk in favor of SBRT (41)(42)(43). For instance, Cengiz et al generated SBRT plans for 11 stage IIB cervical cancer patients and compared the dose distributions with those delivered using BT.…”
Section: Newer Techniques May Offer Dose Distribution Not Exceedinglymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative planning studies showed good dose coverage of the target volumes by stereotactic techniques [20]. Low toxicity and favorable early tumor control has been reported for such an approach in patients who could not undergo brachytherapy [21].…”
Section: Developments In External-beam Radiotherapy Brachytherapy Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precisely distributed dose also gives the opportunity to spare the normal tissues in vicinity. In a dosimetric study performed by Cengiz et al 17 , when compared to high dose rate brachytherapy, SBRS plans had better target coverage and better sparing of critical organs. SBRS is used mainly for small non metastatic primary cancer and oligometastases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%