2015
DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20150090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of intravitreal ranibizumab and bevacizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity

Abstract: Purpose:To compare the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab and bevacizumab treatment for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methods: 36 eyes of 20 patients with type 1 ROP who received anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) intravitreal injections between August 2011 and February 2013 were retrospectively evaluated. Fifteen eyes of 8 patients received 0.25 mg ranibizumab (group 1), and 21 eyes of 12 patients received 0.625 mg be vacizumab (group 2). Eyes were examined by indirect ophthalmos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
34
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
34
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though initial studies on anti-VEGF in ROP were with bevacizumab, later studies have compared it with ranibizumab. Both the drugs were found to be effective, but bevacizumab was shown to be associated with more systemic side effects while recurrence was noted to be more with ranibizumab in one study 7 8. This could be because of the shorter systemic half-life of ranibizumab (2 hours) when compared with bevacizumab (20 days) 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though initial studies on anti-VEGF in ROP were with bevacizumab, later studies have compared it with ranibizumab. Both the drugs were found to be effective, but bevacizumab was shown to be associated with more systemic side effects while recurrence was noted to be more with ranibizumab in one study 7 8. This could be because of the shorter systemic half-life of ranibizumab (2 hours) when compared with bevacizumab (20 days) 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arámbulo et al, sugieren que el bevacizumab escapa del vítreo a la circulación sistémica por su peso y composición molecular; mientras que el ranibizumab es una molécula más pequeña que tiene gran actividad, con tiempo de vida medio más corto en el vítreo comparado con el bevacizumab (16). Lo anterior implicaría una mejoría en la eficacia clínica con menores efectos adversos sistémicos, hallazgo comprobado por Erol et al, en su estudio del 2015 que incluyó 36 ojos de 20 pacientes, en el cual comparaba los efectos de ranibizumab y bevacizumab en ROP, encontrando que la incidencia de la resolución de la enfermedad fue mayor en el grupo de ranibizumab (17).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…They noted that the incidence of disease relapse was higher in eyes that received ranibizumab, and subsequent laser treatment was performed in 6 of 15 eyes treated with IVR compared with 2 of 21 eyes that received IVB [13].…”
Section: Focus On Ranibizumab Versus Bevacizumabmentioning
confidence: 95%