2002
DOI: 10.1109/mwc.2002.986462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of IP micromobility protocols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
116
0
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
116
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Several extensions of Mobile IP have been proposed to mitigate the route-to-home network delay and/or hand-off latency such as HAWAII, Cellular IP, and HMIP (Hierarchical MIP) [7]. These approaches deploy several home agents in a hierarchical manner, especially at the edge routers.…”
Section: Mobile Ipv6 and Its Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several extensions of Mobile IP have been proposed to mitigate the route-to-home network delay and/or hand-off latency such as HAWAII, Cellular IP, and HMIP (Hierarchical MIP) [7]. These approaches deploy several home agents in a hierarchical manner, especially at the edge routers.…”
Section: Mobile Ipv6 and Its Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many MIP variants to support micromobility, which refers to mobility within one domain (intradomain). The handoff latency can be reduced by means of localising signalling via regional/hierarchical registration (tunneling-based) or host-specific routing (routing-based) (Campbell et al, 2002). For tunnel-based micromobility Protocols, there are Mobile IP regional registration, hierarchical MIP and Intra-Domain Mobility Management Protocol (IDMP).…”
Section: Mobility Management Across 3g Network and Wlansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These problems necessitate the use of a forwarding node that has a fixed IP address [3,5,6]. The mobile PC contacts the forwarding node in order to send and receive packets.…”
Section: Forwarding Nodementioning
confidence: 99%