2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-021-02960-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of isoflurane and propofol sedation in critically ill COVID-19 patients—a retrospective chart review

Abstract: Purpose In this retrospective study, we compared inhaled sedation with isoflurane to intravenous propofol in invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients with ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome). Methods Charts of all 20 patients with COVID-19 ARDS admitted to the ICU of a German University Hospital during the first wave of the pandemic between 22/03/2020 and 21/04/2020 were reviewed. Among screened 333 days, isoflurane was used in 97 days, while in 187 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
1
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
10
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, inhaled sedation was not associated with improved oxygenation, in contrast to previous reports in patients without [19] and with COVID-19, [33][34][35] and our longitudinal analyses suggested a potential increase in the partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide and dynamic inspiratory plateau pressure with inhaled sedation. However, there was no strict protocol for mechanical ventilation in our study, and time × group interactions were only significant on day 5 for carbon dioxide and on day 0 for plateau pressure, which is inconsistent with the available evidence in non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 patients [9,[23][24][25][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In our study, inhaled sedation was not associated with improved oxygenation, in contrast to previous reports in patients without [19] and with COVID-19, [33][34][35] and our longitudinal analyses suggested a potential increase in the partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide and dynamic inspiratory plateau pressure with inhaled sedation. However, there was no strict protocol for mechanical ventilation in our study, and time × group interactions were only significant on day 5 for carbon dioxide and on day 0 for plateau pressure, which is inconsistent with the available evidence in non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 patients [9,[23][24][25][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…They also support the efficacy of volatile anesthetics for ICU sedation, as recently confirmed by a large phase 3, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of isoflurane vs. propofol in critically ill patients without COVID-19 [25]. In that trial, as in other studies, [19,22,24] volatile anesthetics were efficacious as the sole sedatives in non-COVID-19 patients and significantly reduced the requirement for other sedative and opioid agents in COVID-19 patients [9,[33][34][35]. Consistent with these findings, the use of inhaled sedation was associated with shorter durations of intravenous sedation (regression coefficient: −0.43; Table 4) in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results hinted that sub-MAC isoflurane inhalation induced neuroinflammation and cognitive decline also in a dose- and exposure length-dependent manner in adult mice. In clinical, the duration of isoflurane sedation for COVID-19 pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome patients was more than 100 h [47] , [48] , [49] . The length of use in mice might not exactly mimic the time used in humans in consideration of their length of life respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%