2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of kinematics of ACL-deficient and healthy knees during passive flexion and isometric leg press

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a real dynamic in vivo validation of the model, the subject's 3D tracking data is needed to be measured during a dynamic activity using a noninvasive technique. The currently available imagining modalities, e.g., MRI and fluoroscopy, however, are unable to produce such data with sufficient accuracy [48]. Moreover, the closed MRI, with a limited tunnel diameter, used in our study, forced us to limit our investigation to the knee mid flexion range, i.e., between full extension and 50 degrees flexion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a real dynamic in vivo validation of the model, the subject's 3D tracking data is needed to be measured during a dynamic activity using a noninvasive technique. The currently available imagining modalities, e.g., MRI and fluoroscopy, however, are unable to produce such data with sufficient accuracy [48]. Moreover, the closed MRI, with a limited tunnel diameter, used in our study, forced us to limit our investigation to the knee mid flexion range, i.e., between full extension and 50 degrees flexion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slice thickness of MR imaging was 4 mm during the experiments, to avoid muscular fatigue which could cause unwanted limb movements and disturb the image quality. With such a large slice thickness, experimental errors in the order of 2 to 4 mm for the translations and 3 to 5 degrees for the rotations are inevitable [48,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is hypothesized that the change in the joint laxity, caused by ACL deficiency, leads to side-to-side difference in the acceleration responses recorded by the IMU sensors, which enables diagnosing of the ACL injury. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that several studies have shown that the kinematics of the healthy and ACL-injured knees are significantly different during gait, 11,12 isometric leg press, 13 and clinical tests. 14 A few researchers have recently investigated the acceleration responses of the ACL-injured knees using IMU sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the biomechanics literature, [11][12][13][14] the kinematic effects associated with the ACL injury have been often assessed and described in terms of the resulting alteration in the tibiofemoral configuration, e.g., tibial anterior translation or internal/external rotation relative to femur. Also, the basis behind all types of the currently available devices for ACL injury diagnosis [6][7][8][9] is to apply an external mechanical perturbation to the knee and measure the resulting changes in the knee configuration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the most reliable methodology to investigate the kinematical efficacy of FKBs is to use medical imaging modalities that provide direct visualization of the position and hence the relative motion of the bones noninvasively. Imaging techniques have been employed for kinematics analysis of the ACL deficient knees in two ( 31 ) and three ( 9 , 32 - 34 ) dimensions often during quasi-static activities. Also, video fluoroscopy has been recently used to measure the kinematic behavior of the normal and ACL injured knees during dynamic activities ( 8 , 35 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%