2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1581540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Kinetic Theory and Hydrodynamics for Poiseuille Flow

Abstract: Comparison of particle (DSMC) simulation with the numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes (NS) equations for pressure-driven plane Poiseuille flow is presented and contrasted with that of the acceleration-driven Poiseuille flow. Although for the acceleration-driven case DSMC measurements are qualitatively different from the NS solution at relatively low Knudsen number, the two are in somewhat better agreement for pressure-driven flow.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
82
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several analytical solutions for the flow field have been presented using the isothermal assumption, for example, the work by Arkilic, Schmidt & Breuer (2001) and Zohar et al (2004). More complicated results have also been obtained numerically using kinetic-based approaches, including the direct simulation Monte Carlo method by Ho & Tai (1998) and Zheng, Garcia & Alder (2000), the information preservation method by Cai et al (2000) and Shen, Fan & Xie (2003), and the gas-kinetic BGK-Burnett method by Xu & Li (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several analytical solutions for the flow field have been presented using the isothermal assumption, for example, the work by Arkilic, Schmidt & Breuer (2001) and Zohar et al (2004). More complicated results have also been obtained numerically using kinetic-based approaches, including the direct simulation Monte Carlo method by Ho & Tai (1998) and Zheng, Garcia & Alder (2000), the information preservation method by Cai et al (2000) and Shen, Fan & Xie (2003), and the gas-kinetic BGK-Burnett method by Xu & Li (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Poiseuille flow [14,15] and the gas flow within a circular cylinder [16][17][18], viscous effects dominate the system, and the gas does not compress much; therefore, we consider them to test the applicability of NSF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the FP model correctly predicts velocity slip temperature jump at the channel walls, and the local temperature minimum in the centre of the channel. The latter is a phenomenon which cannot be captured by a Navier-Stokes-Fourier system, even if the correct velocity slip and temperature jump are imposed at the wall boundaries (see Zheng, Garcia & Alder 2002;Xu 2003Xu , 2004Taheri, Torrilhon & Struchtrup 2009). In order to study field quantities of flows with higher reference Knudsen numbers, in the following subsection another test case with an imposed temperature difference between left and right walls is considered.…”
Section: Homogeneous Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%