2019
DOI: 10.29252/jwmr.9.18.208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Landslide Susceptibility Maps using Logistic Regression (LR) and Generalized Additive Model (GAM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The µ indicates the predictor variable category relationship that is unaffected by nonlinear transformation, while the ε represents the residual. In a traditional GAM network, a feature was made to have monotonically increasing or decreasing properties on the target value by setting constraints and penalty functions or adjusting the number of spline functions [41]. The GAM model are more explanatory than the other black box ML models; they could not be represented as a single function describing the estimated relationship between independent and dependent variables.…”
Section: Gami-netmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The µ indicates the predictor variable category relationship that is unaffected by nonlinear transformation, while the ε represents the residual. In a traditional GAM network, a feature was made to have monotonically increasing or decreasing properties on the target value by setting constraints and penalty functions or adjusting the number of spline functions [41]. The GAM model are more explanatory than the other black box ML models; they could not be represented as a single function describing the estimated relationship between independent and dependent variables.…”
Section: Gami-netmentioning
confidence: 99%