2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-018-4386-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure versus conventional herniotomy in extremely low birth weight infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LPEC was reported in 1995, and has gained popularity as the standard procedure for IH [6]. Operative times were found to be shorter in LPEC [7,8]. Modi ed LPEC displayed a longer operative time than the open method, but no statistically signi cant difference was found in the recurrence rate [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…LPEC was reported in 1995, and has gained popularity as the standard procedure for IH [6]. Operative times were found to be shorter in LPEC [7,8]. Modi ed LPEC displayed a longer operative time than the open method, but no statistically signi cant difference was found in the recurrence rate [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, open surgery has been performed for IH; however, laparoscopy is currently being explored [2] as a treatment option [2][3][4][5]. Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) was rst reported in 1995, and has gained popularity as being the standard treatment procedure for IH [6][7][8][9]. Its bene ts are: 1) con rming the contralateral patent processus vaginalis (CPPV), indicating contralateral side recurrence in the future, and 2) the cosmetic result of the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditionally, open surgery has been performed for IH [2]; however, laparoscopy is currently being explored [3] as a treatment option [3][4][5][6]. Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) was rst reported in 1995, and has gained popularity as being the standard treatment procedure for IH [7][8][9][10]. Its bene ts are: 1) con rming the contralateral patent processus vaginalis (CPPV), indicating contralateral side recurrence in the future, and 2) the cosmetic result of the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pediatric surgery, LPEC is included under MIS. Comparative studies have been performed between LPEC and conventional open surgery [8][9][10]; few papers have been analyzed with respect to the invasiveness that of postoperative early phase symptoms of the procedure. For the evaluation of the postoperative invasiveness, various factors have been investigated, such as operation and anesthesia times, and postoperative pain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%