2020
DOI: 10.1111/ases.12825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of laparoscopic surgery and hand‐assisted laparoscopic surgery in esophagectomy: A propensity score‐matched analysis

Abstract: Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery (LAP) and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for mobilization of the stomach and abdominal lymph node dissection in esophagectomy have become standard procedures in Japan. However, the differences in outcomes between LAP and HALS have not been examined. We aimed to compare the safety and feasibility of these techniques in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Methods: We assessed 171 patients who underwent esophagectomy and reconstruction for clinical stage 0 to IVa esoph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laparoscopic surgery is clearly less invasive and safer than open surgery; 5‐13 however, there is insufficient published evidence concerning the efficacy of LG in older patients. Therefore, it is necessary to study the safety and feasibility of LG in older patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laparoscopic surgery is clearly less invasive and safer than open surgery; 5‐13 however, there is insufficient published evidence concerning the efficacy of LG in older patients. Therefore, it is necessary to study the safety and feasibility of LG in older patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%